Three of 4 Hijacked Jets were taken out of service 9 months before 9/11/2001

Three of 4 Hijacked Jets were taken out of service 9 months prior to 9/11/2001. The 4th jet was Flt, 77 that was alleged to have crashed into the Pentagon with Barbara Olson on board.  But the flight data recorder reported that the cockpit door remained closed throughout the entire flight. These sets of facts make it impossible that hijackers could have commandeered the cockpit through a closed door.
Source:  http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=18405


An FBI report found that Barbara Olsen never completed a call from inside Flt 77.  This dispells the story that hijackers used "box cutters" to over-power the passengers and crew.  Barbara allegedly relayed the "box-cutter" story during an in-flight phone conversation with her husband "Ted Olson". Ted was either lying or perhaps duped by sophisticated voice-synthesizer technology. Olson has never been questioned by the FBI and the media remains silent.

Four of the alleged passengers on American Airlines Flight 11 that struck the North Tower were inexplicably logged again as passengers aboard Flt 175 that struck the South tower.  The last names were logged as: Ward, Weems, Roux and Jalbert on both passenger manifests.

______________________________________________________________

9/11 Planes Were Not Flown For Nearly 1 Year Before Attacks
6/22/2009

U.S. BTS: Last Known Flights Of 9/11 Planes Took Place Nine Months Before 9/11; None For AA 77
What Were They Doing With These Planes For The Year Prior To 9/11?
Submitted by Aidan Monaghan on Mon, 06/22/2009

According to a Freedom of Information Act reply from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, the last known pre-9/11 flights for three of the four aircraft involved in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 took place in December, 2000, nine months before the attacks. No pre-9/11 flight information is available for these planes during 2001.

No pre-9/11 final flight information was provided for American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA).

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations requires carriers to provide on-time data for their commercial aircraft on a monthly basis.

Title 14 § 234.4 Reporting of on-time performance.

(a) Each reporting carrier shall file BTS Form 234 “On-Time Flight Performance Report” with the Office of Airline Information on a monthly basis ... and shall contain the following information:

(1) Carrier and flight number.
(2) Aircraft tail number.
(3) Origin and Destination airport codes.

Source:  http://law.justia.com/us/cfr/title14/14-4.0.1.1.21.html
_________________________________________________________________

ED NOTE: These planes were also not taken out of service for nearly four years after 9/11.Two 9/11 Airliners, Flight 93 and 175, Were Only Just Recently Taken Off The FAA 'Active' List (2005)
Rense.com, By Greg Szymanski 11-26-05
Source: http://www.rense.com/general68/911h.htm

Two of the 9/11 airliners were never 'deregistered' and remained on the 'active' flight list until Sept. 28. 2005. The classification coincidently changed only a month after two inquisitive flight researchers made repeated calls to the FAA, inquiring about the records irregularity.

The two planes in question were Flight 93 and Flight 175, both owned and operated by United Airlines and, according to the official story, both destroyed on 9/11, one in Shanksville, Penn., and the other crashing into the South Tower of the WTC.

Usually a normal procedure after an airliner is destroyed, why it took United more than four years to 'deregister' the airplanes and fill out the official FAA paperwork remains a mystery and never has been fully explained by the FAA or United Airlines.  The FBI continues to show no interest.

In sharp contrast, a check of FAA records shows the two other American Airline jets, Flight 11 and 77, both were 'deregistered' and classified as 'destroyed' just 4 months after 9/11 on Jan. 14, 2002.

"Although the planes are deregistered, they are not listed as cause destroyed but rather as cause cancelled. The American airplanes are clearly listed as cause destroyed but the United planes were not.

"There is a guy who was saying on a web posting that he knew one of the United planes was still in service in Chicago. I know nothing of how he would know this or who he was but I think he was the same guy who brought this stuff to our attention and he's clearly right about the planes still being registered.

"Two planes destroyed and two planes still flying? Are you familiar with the Cleveland airport mystery? So did Flight 93 land at Cleveland with 200 passengers on board?"

A recent check of FAA records proves the flight researcher's statements correct as Flight 93 identified as N591UA and Flight 175 as N612UA, both were taken off the active FAA list in September with a reason given as 'cancelled' not 'destroyed.'

The FAA again was contacted this week, giving the same answers given to the two researchers back in August regarding the late deregistration. And in regards to listing both United flights as 'cancelled not destroyed,' FAA officials also gave no further explanation.

Besides the FAA deregistration issue, solid evidence has also come forward that two of the 9/11 flights, Flight 11 and 77, never even existed at all, according to Bureau of Traffic Safety (BTS) records.

According to BTS statistics, both 11 and 77 officially never took-off on 9/11. The meticulous data kept on every airliner taking-off at every airport in the country also showed no elapsed run-way time, wheels-off time and taxi-out time, not to mention several other categories left blank on 9/11 concerning the two flights.

Although Flights 11 and 77 have the above data meticulously logged on 9/10, it was suspiciously absent on 9/11, even when every other plane that took of that day had been recorded and logged by the BTS.

Why the discrepancy? No one has ever given an official explanation for the BTS missing flight data, even though it is well known that airports are extremely concerned about recording accurate BTS data for each and every flight in and out of its airport for liability purposes.

More importantly critics contend this is another clear indication Flight 11 and 77 were only 'phantom flights," adding even further doubt to the credibility of the official government story concerning 9/11.

Besides the FAA and BTS irregularities, the official flight lists from all four flights have been a serious bone of contention for 9/11 critics, who call attention to the glaring errors and conflicting passenger numbers on many of the flight lists released, many coming from unverified sources.

On Flight 11, for example, American Airlines released two different lists containing 77 and 75 names the day after 9/11, but the Washington Post published 89 names the same day while the Boston Daily published 89 names with conflicting names, however. Remember, complicating matters worse, Fox News all along was still claiming that only 81 names were confirmed a week later.

Through out the years, not only have the numbers conflicted but so have the names on the lists. Gerald Holmgren, a 9/11 researcher who has spent much time and effort researching the flight irregularities found one of the most glaring errors never explained by the airlines or the government.

Holmgren, whose compilation of 9/11 flight data can be found at
http://indymedia.all2all.org/news/2004/05/84711.php , uncovered that four of the alleged passengers on American Airlines Flight 11 (North Tower) with the last names of  Ward, Weems, Roux and Jalbert were also listed as passengers on Flight 175 that struck the South Tower.