CONSPIRACY THEORY

Jesse Ventura - Conspiracy Theory ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Watch live streaming video from trutv at livestream.com

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ LINK: http://livestream.com/trutv

Larry King hears about Jesse Ventura's "Conspiracy Theory"

“Why is it off limits to question and ask questions?” Steve Watson, Tuesday, Dec 1, 2009 Former Governor of Minnesota, ex-Navy SEAL and retired pro-wrestler Jesse Ventura raised some important unanswered questions regarding the 9/11 attacks in an interview with Larry King on CNN last night. Ventura spoke about and gave a sneak peak of his new Tru TV show, Conspiracy Theory, set to air Wednesday night. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Footage from the 9/11 based episode showed Ventura attempting to gain access to the infamous hanger 17 at Kennedy International Airport where debris from the World Trade Center is kept away from public scrutiny. “The 9/11 conspiracy is simply that the government hasn’t been truthful with us.” Ventura stated. “I mean, Larry, a couple weeks ago, the head of the 9/11 Commission legal, I believe former attorney general Farmer from New Jersey, came out publicly and stated unequivocally that at some point the government decided that the American citizens would not hear the truth about 9/11. I find that very disturbing.” he continued. “I find it very difficult that those buildings could fall at the speed of gravity without being assisted in some way. And I used to do demolition for a living. And how could those buildings fall as fast as I used to freefall out of an airplane?” “If you took a billiard ball and dropped it the height of the twin towers and you just merely stopped it and started it every floor in freefall, it would take over a minute and a half to reach the ground. The buildings were down in ten seconds.” “So you think there was something on the inside.” King replied. “Here is the big point I make on 9/11,” Ventura asserted. “Why is it off limits to talk about it? Why is it off limits to question and ask questions? You know when I went through Navy SEAL training I was taught in demolition that there is no dumb question, that if you don’t understand it then it is not dumb. That’s how I have lived my life and I have a lot of questions that the government refuses to answer.” King also asked Ventura his opinion on the troop escalation in Afghanistan: “It angers me because it reminds me a great deal of Vietnam.” Ventura answered. “I mean, the Russians couldn’t beat them, the English couldn’t beat them over there. You are not going to get a military solution in my opinion in Afghanistan. It’s impossible, yet we’re just like in Vietnam, are we propping up a phony government, like we did in Vietnam?” “Remember, the United States blocked free elections in Vietnam. Had there been elections in Vietnam, Ho Chi Min would have won in a landslide. Well is this the same thing going on?” “I would pull out of Afghanistan and I would pull out of Iraq and I would bring our boys home. It is our job to protect their safety, and not be sending them off to wars. What are we accomplishing there? I look at it from a personal point of view. I don’t see how these two wars have helped Jesse Ventura or the USA one bit, other than to drain our economy.” , Ventura fumed. Source

Afghanistan: What Obama will dare not tell America

By Ron Larsen LibertyCalling.com November 30, 2009 During his address before the U.S. Military Academy at West Point on Tuesday, December 1, expect President Obama to ask the American people to support his sending an additional 34,000 U.S. troops to fight for freedom in Afganistan so that we do not have to fight radical, militiant Islamic terrorism in the American homeland in coming years. He will probably refer to the shootings at Camp Hood allegedly commited by an Islamic military officer and psychiarist with al-Queda connections earlier this month this month to convince us that al-Queda based terrorism constitutes a genuine threat to the safety of Americans, even those living in the homeland. Obama will probably go on to say that the heroic Amercan military troops fighting for freedom in Afghanistan since shortly after 9/11, have significantly reduced the numbers of al-Queda and Taliban insurgents fighting there and add that, nevertheless, the still pose of significant threat to the security of the people of that nation and so must be eliminated. Furthermore, he will likely add that to honor the American who died fighting there, he intends to finish the job started by President Bush shortly after the 9/11, which is to rid Afghanistan of al-Queda and Taliban fighters and then train Afghanistant troops to defend their own homeland. That’s sweet Obama rhetoric. Let the violins play. But how does all of it square with the assertions General James Jones, Obama’s national security advisor, made on October 4 concerning the current strength of Taliban and al-Queda forces in Afghanistan and their danger to American troops and that nation’s people? According to an article published that day in the Washington Times, General Jones said that Afghanistan is not imminent danger of falling to the Taliban. Furthermore, he estimated total al-queda presence in Afghanistan at 100, a drop in a bucket. What Obama will not tell us is that additional troops are needed to guard the opium poppy fields because of record yields now achieved each year and expansion of growing area and that the opium industry there was designed by the United States over thirty years ago. The opium trade is big business there and worldwide and revenues are comparable with energy industry levels. Professor writes in a 2006 article titled, Who benefits from the Afghan Opium Trade?, published by GlobalResearch.ca, “…what distinguishes narcotics from legal commodity trade is that narcotics constitutes a major source of wealth formation not only for organized crime but also for the US intelligence apparatus, which increasingly constitutes a powerful actor in the spheres of finance and banking. This relationship has been documented by several studies including the writings of Alfred McCoy.” What Obama will also not tell us is that the growing presence of the U.S. is all consistent with Zbigniew Brzezinski’s master plan for America’s securing control of Central Asia and Caspian Sea gas and oil producing nations. Brzezinski, elistist master stategist and founder of the Trilateral Commission along with George Soros and David Rockefeller and well as former national security advisor to President Carter, see control of that corridor, which includes the old Silk Route, is the key to control of the world’s commerce. His plan was laid out in masterful detail in his 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard, which may be read free online at Scribd. The presence of the U.S.military in Afghanistan is pivotal to execution of this plan. Whoever controls Afghanistan controls access to all of the major gas and oil pipelines in this region. It also serves from a logistical standpoint as the perfect staging area for U.S. miliary troop foreays into Pakistan and neighboring countries in Central Asia and into the oil and gas rich Caspian Sea Region. According to historian and author Webster Tarpley, Brzezinski met Obama when he was a student at Columbia University, became his political mentor and was responsible for Obama’s winning the U.S. presidency. Brzezinski still serves as Obama’s unnamed strategist and advisor. During the 2008 presidential campaign season, Obama’s focus on what he believe was a vital need of the U.S. to switch its military focus from Iraq to Afghanistan. This lends credibility to Tarpley’s contention that Brzezinski is guiding if no specifying Obama policy decisions in Afghanistan and Pakistan and, in fact, all of Cenral Asia, South Caucusus and the Caspian basin.

Bob Kerrey admits 9/11 Commission could not do it's job

Submitted by bbruhwiler8 on Sun, 11/29/2009 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1/3 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2/3 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3/3 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ WeAreChangeLA's Jeremy Rothe-Kushel, Katy Kurtzman, Bruno Bruhwiler, Dan Noel, and Paul Wittenberger confront 9-11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey about the 9-11 False Flag attack. Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qrqq2KxyWAs In Part 1, Jeremy asks Kerrey about the fact that Al Qaeda couldn't have brought down the buildings on Ground Zero with high tech explosives. So who is the real threat? Kerrey's response? "I was there that morning, I saw two planes fly into them." Katy Kurtzman hands Bob Kerrey the peer-reviewed paper that proves high-tech explosives were used in the destruction of the three WTC towers on 9-11-01 in NYC. What about building 7? "That building was full of fuel... that question has been examined by the 9-11 Commission." "If in New York City, that thing had been blown up, believe me, the people of New York would know and would be angry about it." Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fczMuxtOEU8 "We've been identified by these organizations as the number one enemy... as the 'head of the snake' as Bin Laden has described us... We've got to go to Afghanistan because that's where Bin Laden and Al Qaeda are... When it comes to National Security, public opinion can be dangerous." - Bob Kerrey In Part 2, Bruno reminds Kerrey that all the current torture, loss of freedoms, and deaths around the world lead back to Ground Zero on 9-11. The pressure mounts, so Kerrey begins to back track and make excuses for the 9-11 Commission. Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtJWBcWAeAw In Part 3, Dan Noel who is also an engineer member of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth hands Bob Kerrey a card of information directing him to the proof of controlled demolition of the three WTC towers http://www.ae911truth.org. Paul Wittenberger asks Kerrey about Building 7. Jeremy confronts Kerrey about the aspects of treason involved with covering up the truth about 9-11, and Kerrey responds "It's a 30 year conspiracy". # # #

MSNBC: Schuster's "bias" rejects opinion that Bin Laden's escape was deliberate.

George Bush is frequently bashed by Schuster (and most of liberal media) as a manipulator and liar on almost any issue. But when it comes to the runup to the illegal invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, even Bush's loudest criticts will defend him against the existing hard evidence that he lied about 9/11 and lied about failing to capture Bin Laden so as to justify the future invasion of oil-rich Iraq. When it comes to really important issues, the Democrats and Republicans will agree with each other - not just in Congress, but all the way down the Democrat and Republican political food chain. MSNBC (Microsoft) Cuts off Rep. Hinchley while he repeats assertions aired many times and most notably by John Kerry during the 2008 presidential Campaign -- An example of how so-called "Liberals" are divided calling each other liars on the issue of the pretext for war and denial that 9/11 could have possibly been an inside job even thogh it was never investigated.....HWS Rep. Hinchey: Bush Administration 'Intentionally Let bin Laden Get Away' In Order To Justify Iraq War digg Huffpost - Rep. Hinchey: Bush Administration 'Intentionally Let bin Laden Get Away' In Order To Justify Iraq War stumble reddit del.ico.us First Posted: 11-30-09 07:28 PM Updated: 11-30-09 08:21 PM On Monday afternoon, Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-New York) told MSNBC host David Shuster that the Bush administration "intentionally let bin Laden get away" in order to justify the Iraq war. Hinchey is from a historically Republican district (though it includes Democrat-heavy in places like Woodstock and Ithaca) and his statement seemed to shock Shuster. "Look what happened. Look what happened with regard to our invasion into Afghanistan. How we apparently intentionally let bin Laden get away. How we intentionally did not follow the Taliban and al Qaeda." Hinchey alleged that bin Laden was let go because "the previous administration... knew very well that if they would capture al Qaeda there would be no justification for an invasion in Iraq." Shuster, incredulous, pushed back: "You really believe that?" "Oh, there's no question about that because the leader of the military operation in the United States called back our military, called them back from going after the head of al Qaeda because there was a sense that they didn't want to capture him." Shuster began talking over Hinchey: "You can accuse them of malfeasance, you can accuse them of dropping the ball, of having an awful plan, and all of them would be justified, but to suggest that they would deliberately let, deliberately let Osama bin Laden get away so they could justify the war in Iraq... That will strike a lot of people as crazy." Hinchey leaned back and smiled wrily. "I don't think it'll strike a lot of people as crazy. I think it'll strike a lot of people as very accurate." He continued to explain his reasoning, but MSNBC ended his segment. MORE BACKGROUND ON THIS LINK: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/30/rep-hinchey-bush-adminini_n_374640.html

CLIMATEGATE: Interview with former MP and physicist, Peter Lilley

Posted 11/23/2009: Former minister MP and Physicist, Peter Lilley joined RT to discuss the scandal dubbed Climategate. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Army Recruits Internment/Resettlement Troops

Without National Sovereignty,

anyone can qualify for "internment"

Published in August, 2001 only a few weeks before the 9/11/ attacks CLICK HERE for full manual in PDF ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Army Link: http://www.goarmy.com/JobDetail.do?id=292

Al Gore confronted on ClimateGate in Chicago

CHICAGO IL – On Tuesday, November 24th 2009, We Are Change Chicago attended a book signing with former vice president Al Gore, at the Borders Bookstore on 150 N. State Street. GLOBAL WARMING PETITION PROJECT +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The previous Thursday, news had begun to circulate that hacked documents and communications from the University of East Anglia’s Hadley Climate Research Unit (CRU) had been published to the internet. The information revealed how top scientists conspired to falsify data in the face of declining global temperatures in order to prop up the premise that man-made factors are driving climate change. Please review ClimateGate for Dummies. To ensure the public that the media and Al Gore are aware of the facts that prove global warming to be a hoax, patriots from WAC Chicago marched to the book signing. Scattered throughout a crowd of a few hundred were members of WAC Chicago ready to ask Al Gore what he thought about ‘ClimateGate.’ First up was Saad Ali. As he approached Gore, he peacefully and respectably asked, “Sir, can you comment on the emails and documents that were hacked [ClimateGate] that reveal… that the research was a fraud and that it was all manipulated?” Gore, with an evil smirk, claimed that “he never read them.” By the look on his face and his stutter, it became quite clear that Gore was extremely uncomfortable with the question, so he quickly glared towards his security. The agents grabbed and assaulted Saad, escorting him away from Gore for merely asking a simple question. The press took notice and started filming and snapping pictures of what was going on. One of which appeared the next day in the Chicago Sun Times. We Are Change Chicago at the Al Gore book signing. Following Saad’s confrontation, Sati Word, a member of WAC Chicago, questioned Gore on why the IPCC hasn’t released any reports on sunspot activity. However, before he could get an answer from Gore, security grabbed Sati and escorted him out of the building. A little while later, Anthony, an activist from We Are Change Ohio, approached Gore and handed him the petition of the 31,486 scientists who say that Global Warming is a complete hoax. Anthony asked, “What do you think about the science behind this sir?” Mr. Gore rolled his eyes, and security escorted him out of the building. Steve (swizzlesteve), was the last activist to question Gore. Within seconds of asking, “Any comments on ClimateGate? The emails that prove it’s a scam, a farce, that global warming is a joke, any comment?” Mr. Gore is heard to utter a few “uhhhhhhhs” and security quickly steps in to remove him as well. The press was waiting outside Borders. They wanted to find out who this group was, that dared question what the elite had forced us to consume as truth. WBBM news radio, 780, ran a sound bite of WAC Chicago, WGN news ran footage, Medill Reports wrote an article, and blog posts were popping up all over the internet about the Al Gore confrontation in Chicago. Many also asked about the footage of WAC Chicago chasing after Gore’s SUV after the event. You will find all of it in this video. Al Gore was confronted multiple times in line, outside the event as he rushed to his waiting Mercedes SUV, (were you expecting something electric?), and once again in the streets of Chicago. We Are Change had people outside with signs, banners, fliers, and DVDs. Activists were inside asking questions and demanding answers; the world is waking up, it’s a great time to be alive.

COMPUTER HACKER REVEALS NEW WORLD ORDER AGENDA

COMPUTER HACKER PROVIDES LARGE SET-BACK in GLOBALISTS' NEW WORLD ORDER of TYRRANY This is a gift to empowerment us to break the code on the huge campaign of mind manipulation through Propaganda and fear. Listen to James Corbett of "The Corbett Report" +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Blackwater's Secret War in Pakistan and Uzbechistan

Scahill's Interview on Democracy Now: Nov. 24, 2009 - Video Interview, Transcript and link to THE NATION article ++++++++++++++++++ Xe Services exposé by Jeremy Scahill for The Nation Magazine, Blackwaters Secret War in Pakistan, might have provoked a formidable tempest in a teapot among the righteous human rights fighters, the indignant lawyers and duplicitous politicians. For the diplomatic, intelligence and military communities, which are motivated by callous pragmatism rather than heart-breaking emotions, the latest revelations about Blackwaters not-so-secret ops provide bitter food for thought. JSOC Overview: The Joint Special Operations Command has been used as a covert military action force similar to the CIA except that Congress is NOT allowed any oversight of JSOC operations. The full text of PDD-25 is reported to exempt the JSOC from the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 18USC Sec.1385, PL86-70, Sec. 17[d]. which makes it illegal for military and law enforcement to exercise jointly. This exemption from Constitutional law makes it possible for the President to order JSOC operations inside the US with no requirement to inform Congress. FULL EXPLANATION: Click Here