Army shreds documents on friendly fire deaths

Army shreds documents on friendly fire deaths Posted on Tuesday, March 03, 2009 @ 13:25:56 EST by POPEYE US News popeye writes In late 2006, two American soldiers from Fort Carson died in Iraq. The army said the privates were killed by enemy action.....THAT WAS A LIE! In late 2006, two American soldiers from Fort Carson died in Iraq. The army said the privates were killed by enemy action. But in October of this year, Salon revealed that the two men had in fact been killed by friendly tank fire. Now, Salon has found that the documents related to the men's deaths were shredded just hours after the story was published. "Three soldiers at Fort Carson, Colo. -- including two who were present in Ramadi during the friendly fire incident, one of them just feet from where Nelson and Suarez died -- were ordered to shred two boxes full of documents about [Albert] Nelson and [Roger] Suarez," reporter Mark Benjamin writes. "One of the soldiers preserved some of the documents as proof that the shredding occurred and provided them to Salon. All three soldiers, with the assistance of a U.S. senator's office, have since been relocated for their safety." The night the Salon story ran, Oct. 14, 2008, a staff sergeant told three soldiers to shred two boxes of documents relating to the privates' deaths. "Staff Sgt. Swinton was in charge that night," Benjamin adds. "He told Kremling, Mitchum and a third soldier who had reported for duty that the evening's labor would include the inglorious task of cleaning out a closet. The first priority, Swinton said, was to shred the thousands of pages of documents in two large copy-paper-size boxes. It would be tedious work, but Swinton was adamant. 'He says, 'I need that paper shredded. That has to be done tonight,'' remembered Kremling, who volunteered to get started on the job." Privates Nelson and Suarez appear to have been killed by an American tank shell -- not in fact by enemy action as the military claimed. "Based on the testimony of eyewitnesses, and on video and audio recorded by a helmet-mounted camera that captured much of the action that day, my report stated that Nelson and Suarez seemed to have been killed by an American tank shell," Benjamin said. "The shell apparently struck their position on the roof of a two-story ferro-concrete building in Ramadi, Anbar province, Iraq, killing Suarez instantly, mortally wounding Nelson, and injuring several other soldiers. I included both an edited and a full-length version of the video in the article. The video shows soldiers just after the blast claiming to have watched the tank fire on them. Then a sergeant attempts to report over a radio that a U.S. tank killed his men. He seems to be promptly overruled by a superior officer who is not at the scene. An official Army investigation then found that the simultaneous impact of two enemy mortars killed the men." The helmet cam video capturing the scene appears below. It contains coarse language and graphic violence. Source: http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/10/14/friendlyfirevideo/index.html?source=video&aim=/news/feature

Is Hutto Family Prison a model for FEMA CAMPS?

T. Don Hutto Residential Center, 1001 Welch St., Taylor, 218-2400 Watch this short film on the T. Don Hutto "residential facility", the nations for-profit family prison for non-criminal immigrant families. This prototype for privatized family detention is located just north of Austin, TX. As they get rich off our tax-dollars, corporations terrorize and traumatize families just trying to keep survive. A determined people stand in solidarity with the families inside Hutto and work to close this immoral prison Written by Rob Heidrick Friday, 13 February 2009 The T. Don Hutto Residential Center, an immigrant detention facility in Taylor, will continue to operate under a contract renewed by the Williamson County Commissioners Court Dec. 23. The 512-bed center holds families of non-criminal immigrants as they await rulings on whether they will be allowed to remain in the country. A private company, Corrections Corporation of America, owns and operates the facility with funds from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office. The county plays an administrative role under the contract, acting as a local go-between and financial agent in exchange for roughly $15,000 in administrative fees each month. ICE pays CCA $2.8 million a month for operating expenses, which first must pass through the county, according to the original contract. The Commissioners Court voted 4-1 to extend the agreement until Jan. 11, 2011. Only Precinct One Commissioner Lisa Birkman voted against the measure. “We’re supporting the federal government’s stand on immigration, and this affords the opportunity for the families to be able to stay together,” Williamson County Precinct Four Commissioner Ron Morrison said. “If the current government changes its stand on immigration, I’m sure we’ll change our stand on it as well.” History: T. Don Hutto is a former medium-security prison that was converted into a family detention center in 2006, making it the second of its kind in operation. Per ICE standards, families are housed together, but are separated by gender. Morrison estimated that residents remain in the facility for an average of 40 to 45 days, some staying as little as two or three days and some as long as six months. The average length of stay in ICE centers nationwide was just more than 30 days in 2008, according to ICE. Some county residents have protested the conditions inside the complex, claiming it retains prison-like qualities that are unsuitable for families with children. “There are detention facilities that are appropriate for families,” said Jose Orta, president of Taylor’s chapter of the League of United Latin American Citizens. “This facility, which was once a medium-security prison, is not appropriate to detain families, especially children.” Lawsuit: In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit against ICE, alleging that T. Don Hutto violated federal guidelines governing the treatment of detained minors. The ACLU and its clients claimed the facility was being run as a prison, with child detainees forced to remain inside cells most of the day while wearing prison uniforms. ICE settled the suit and agreed to a set of conditions to make the center more family friendly, including improvements to educational facilities, better access to medical care and more time outdoors for children. “We can’t hide the fact that it has been a prison,” Morrison said. “At least [the children] are staying with their moms and their dads and they’re not being separated. That’s the reason I continue to vote for the contract.” After the settlement, the Williamson County Sheriff’s Department began sending officers on random inspections of T. Don Hutto to ensure satisfactory conditions are being met. No violations have been reported. Options: Orta and others in the community contend that there are alternative ways of detaining immigrant families that would be more suitable than the former prison. Orta suggested that the center relocate to a vacant nursing home facility in Taylor, where electronic ankle bracelets could be used to monitor residents. “If T. Don Hutto closed, I would imagine that the children and their families would be transferred to another facility that is more family oriented,” Orta said. Morrison said he would support relocating detainees to the former nursing home, but the county could not operate the center without the current funding arrangement. “I’d like to see a different facility than a refurbished jail, but that’s what’s available,” Morrison said. “If they close it, does that mean we’re going to stop immigration? No. It means that it goes someplace else, probably not in our county.” The contract between Williamson County and CCA was last amended in October 2007 with the addition of a clause protecting the county from liability in any future lawsuits. Defining the county’s role * Williamson County is the local administrator of the contract between the federal government and Corrections Corporation of America, the private company that owns and operates the T. Don Hutto Residential Center. * The county’s agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office is called an Intergovernmental Service Agreement, or IGA. This partnership allows the federal government to fund and remotely manage T. Don Hutto while the county monitors the conditions at the facility. * ICE pays Williamson County $2.8 million each month, and the county immediately passes the funds on to CCA, withholding an administrative fee of $1 per detainee per day. In this system, the county earns about $15,000 a month. * In 2007 the county amended its contract with CCA to include a liability protection clause. In the event that someone files a lawsuit against T. Don Hutto, CCA guarantees up to $250,000 in legal fees to support the county. * More than 300 ICE detention facilities are operated under state or local IGAs. This accounts for about two-thirds of the total ICE population. For more information on T. Don Hutto and immigration, visit www.correctionscorp.com or www.dhs.gov/index.shtm.

Debut: THE N3TWORK -- News by and for "We,The People"

The N3TWORK- Your Truth - Exposing Big Media I know I haven't posted here in a while, but it doesn't mean that I haven't been active :) I have switched gears and for the last eight months have been fully invested in our new online media company called the N3TWORK. The N3TWORK is an independent media organization that explores issues not typically discussed by the mainstream because we are not swayed by corporate, political, or religious influences. Our only influence is the interest of the people. At the N3TWORK, we hope to generate inspiration and empowerment through awareness. Instead of assigning blame, we encourage individuals to become responsible and active citizens. PROMO CLIP: A Must-See! Our first two episodes are on net neutrality and genetically modified foods, and our third episode just launched today and exposes big media for the frauds that they are. The episode exposes the corporate control of the media, highlights cases of media censorship (9/11 included of course), and features an interview with Peter Phillips from Project Censored. Our goal with the N3TWORK is to introduce these serious issues to a more mainstream audience, by making our presentation as interactive and mainstream as we can. We have episodes coming up on constitutional rights, global warming, and the fluoridation of our water supplies. Until now, Dylan Avery has been working behind the scenes for the show making most of the amazing graphics that you see throughout the episodes. He is moving on to much bigger things but we will miss his awesome work :) You can watch all of our episodes so far at http://yournetwork.tv/episodes.php We are also doing a music show and are looking for unsigned musicians to feature on our show if you are in the California area. We are looking for artists to submit designs for our t-shirt contest too, so check out the content and features at www.YourNetwork.tv Hope you guys check out the episode, the site, and spread the word! Let's get the word out about all these issues, and break the false left right paradigm in this country that has everyone blinded to the truth. Thanks ya'll, and thanks to all the truthers who are out there every day spreading awareness in their communities! Posted to 911 Blogger by Abby http://911blogger.com/node/19513

NBC News Covers Chemtrails "TOXIC SKY"

NBC News Covers Chemtrails - May 23, 2006 - http://www.nbclosangeles.com/ It's a quiet mountain community, but some residents claim something's happening in the sky that's making them sick -- Mystery clouds and unusual contrails ... Is it a weather experiment on a massive scale? In a Channel 4 News investigation, Paul Moyer looks into why some say the government is manipulating the weather. Transcript: http://www.skylies.org/html/toxicsky.html Transcript of KNBC "Toxic Sky" - May 23, 2006 Note: Items in parenthesis are added to the transcript for clarification purposes.) Paul Moyer: “Tonight, a community in the San Bernardino mountains has a real mystery on its hands. The official explanation here is that jet contrails are causing strange lines in the sky and that it’s pollen making people sick on the ground. But others are convinced it is something else. And they ask: ‘Is the government experimenting with our weather?’” Cedar Glenn, California, resident Gretchen Sherman: “There is a huge dust cloud.” Paul Moyer: Long-time Cedar Glenn resident, Gretchen Sherman, says she has never seen anything like it. Paul Moyer: “How big was it?” Sherman: “Oh, it covered the entire Cedar Glen area.” Paul Moyer: A cloud of dust leaving a sticky yellow slime all over her car. It happened again last February (2006). And calls began pouring in to the local Alpenhorn newspaper. Alpenhorn News Publisher, Dennis Labadie: “And they had a tremendous upsurge of children that were not going to school at that point.” Paul Moyer: Pharmacist Ed Burrows says it is the most mysterious illness he’s seen in twenty-two years on the mountain. Ed Burrows: “A lot of eye infection problems, upper respiratory problems, nose bleeds.” Paul Moyer: The nearby March Air force Base says it didn’t come from them. Others said it was a pollen cloud. The Department of Health found a yellowish tint on a tissue submitted for testing. But (quote): "There was no sign of any biological form such as cedar pollen.” And the test was ruled inconclusive. And it wasn’t long before things ballooned into a sky-high mystery. Paul Moyer: The story is not just here in Crestline and the alleged yellow cloud. People say the government is up there in airplanes spraying all kinds of chemicals to change or manipulate the weather. Paul Moyer: Leaving what you see there. And they call that a chemtrail? “So when I look up there and what I think are contrails, you’re telling me are chemtrails.” Alpenhorn Newspaper Report, Laurie Kelly: “Yes. A contrail would be dissipated by now.” (The Alpenhorn Newspaper article is reprinted below-2006.) Paul Moyer: “It would?” Laurie Kelly: “Yes, It would.” Paul Moyer: Chemtrails. On the Internet they are cited as proof of the government creating clouds to combat global warming. In response the Air Force says that [quote]: “There is no such thing as a chemtrail. The actual contrails are a safe and natural phenomenon. And that people are seeing more contrails simply because there are more jets forming large clouds, depending on weather conditions, as in this video of alleged chemtrails shot near San Francisco.” Professor Gregory Benford of UC Irvine works with the Department of Energy (DOE) on weather research. Gregory Benford: After viewing a short film segment of the skies above San Francisco and Marin County Professor Benford stated: “I think these are contrails.” Another film segment brought the following statement: “That’s very odd. They could be very large contrails.” Paul Moyer: He says the DOE doesn’t know of any jets spraying chemicals to affect the weather. However, he says, we will probably see it in the near future. Gregory Benford: “You’ve got to, in a sense, engineer all these, so you get the right kind of clouds, with the effects we want.” Paul Moyer: It is called geoengineering. Fighting global warming by putting a chemical dust in the atmosphere and reflecting harmful radiation back into space. Gregory Benford: “You could use barium oxide, for example, which makes big fluffy clouds. You could use tiny little bits of aluminum, which is benign in the environment, and essentially manage the climate.” But Rosalind Peterson of California Skywatch (former California U.S.D.A., Certified Crop Loss Adjustor-More Information Website: californiaskywatch.com) says Health Department records show a sharp increase in both chemicals in the water supply of Northern California, dating from the time the huge contrails first appeared over her home in Mendocino County (California). Rosalind Peterson: “And what I found was unusual spiking (in California drinking water tests) since the early 1990s, and barium, aluminum…” Paul Moyer: “What’s the significance of the barium and the aluminum?” Rosalind Peterson: “I went and got all the tests (from the California State Department of Health, Drinking Water Division since 1984) and all these things in the same test would be up way over state and federal standards. This had to be airborne because how could it get into such diverse regions of our county (and State drinking water supplies)? Rosalind Peterson: “We have jets going in every direction: Xs, east-west, north-south, circles. There is something going on in the air. I don’t know exactly what but I think there is some experimentation.” Paul Moyer: “Is it legal?” Rosalind Peterson: “I don’t know because we haven’t had a public discussion.” Paul Moyer: But what is unknown today may be actual fact tomorrow thanks to a bill soon to be voted on in the U.S. Senate, a weather modification act calling for research in [quote] “...attempting to change or control by artificial methods the natural development of atmospheric cloud forms…” Paul Moyer: “Doesn’t it seem to you that they’re going to be doing it in future, for sure?” Rosalind Peterson: “Yes, and if they are, I want to know about it. Paul Moyer: In the meantime a lot of people are wondering if they’ll ever get clear skies and a clear answer. Paul Moyer: “The legislation is there. Therefore somebody is thinking about this. How does this make sense…?” Laurie Kelly: “I don’t know. Maybe they’re practicing.” Paul Moyer: “…over Cedar Glen, over Arrowhead?” Laurie Kelly: “Ah, I guess you have to try it out before you use it. I’m not sure.” Paul Moyer: “Well, you be the judge. We’ll keep you posted on anything further on this story. And there will be more, that’s for sure. More information on the weather modification proposals, check on our website: NBC4.tv.” END FOR NOW…

GLENN BECK and FOX Talk about FEMA CAMPS

Source; Brasscheck TV: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/577.html During the Bush Administration, FEMA was given hundreds of millions of dollars to retrofit former military bases and other existing infrastructure so they can be used as "camps." Not camps as in summer camps. Camps as in prison camps and perhaps even concentration camps. One of the first thing the Obama Administration did was to legitimize their existence. These camps, which can be found in every state in the union, currently sit empty and are intended to be pressed into service in the event of an "emergency." Funny that we've made it over 200 years without needing a national network of on-demand concentration camps. Why do we need them now? It's been suggested they've been built to deal with a massive influx of illegal aliens. My guess is they were built with the knowledge that the US is going to experience a severe economic dislocation that is going to: a) require the suspension or serious reduction of social welfare payments (i.e. millions of suddenly desperate people in the streets) and b) financially wipe out tens of millions of formerly middle class Americans who are going to realize more or less all at once that their futures have been stolen from them by the people at the top In other words, the crooks are covering their bets. When governments have money, they buy peace with social welfare programs. When they run out of money, as the US is doing, the gloves come off. Or we can hope that these camps, built by Halliburton subsidiary KBR, were just another way for Cheney to rip off the country for his friends. Of course, nothing prevents both scenarios from being accurate. 3/3/2009 - FOX and Freinds 3/3/2009 - Glenn Beck discusses FEMA Camps and Obama Policy with Ron Paul. On March 4th, Glenn Beck expresses his unrest about the future of the USA and puts patriotism above party politics. Beck claims he is a Libertarian.

Iran asks Interpol to arrest Israeli war criminals

Iran asks Interpol to arrest Israeli war criminals
Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:36:57 GMT

Tehran's Public Prosecutor Saeed Mortazavi

Interpol begins studying Iran's request for the arrest of 15 senior Israeli officials over war crimes committed during the Gaza offensive.

At a news briefing on Sunday, Tehran's Public Prosecutor, Saeed Mortazavi, said that Iran had referred the case to the International Criminal Police Organization (ICPO or Interpol), drawing on the organization's charter and Israel's violation of the Geneva Conventions.

"Governments of 180 countries have received the information necessary for identifying the suspects," he said.

In a Monday statement, Iran's judiciary said that it has asked Interpol to issue an international Red Notice security alert for the 15 Israeli officials who were involved in the 23-day Israeli offensive on Gaza.

The statement added that the judiciary was also looking into complaints made against 100 other Israelis, with top military and government posts.

In December 2008, Iran's judicial body announced a decision to set up a court to investigate complaints, made by wounded Gazans against Israel and delivered to Iran by the Palestinian envoy.

The judiciary said that it would be ready to try the implicated Israeli officials in absentia.

"In the current week, we have completed our investigation of about 15 individuals who were among those criminals," IRIB, Iran's State Television, quoted Mortazavi as saying.

"Based on our investigation and according to article 2 of the Interpol charter, we asked Interpol to arrest these suspects."

Mortazavi said the charges included war crimes, invasion, occupation, genocide and crimes against humanity.

The Iranian prosecutor was referring to Israeli strikes that started on December 27 on the densely populated Palestinian coastal territory and did not end until it had claimed the lives of more than 1,330 Gazans, mostly civilians.

Many international NGOs and human rights organizations, Palestinians wounded in the Gaza onslaught, more than 5,700 Iranian lawyers and attorneys in the Iranian Bar Association along with a large number of medics were also among those who filed complaints against Tel Aviv, Mortazavi added.

The list of Israeli war criminals includes:

1 Outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
2 Defense Minister Ehud Barak
3 Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni
4 Chief of the General Staff Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi
5 Commander in Chief of the Israeli Air Force Ido Nehoshtan
6 Commander of the Gaza war -- Operation Cast Lead -- Maj. Gen. Yoav Galant
7 Head of Military Intelligence Directorate Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin
8 Commander of Battalion 13 in the Golani Brigade Lt. Col. Oren Cohen
9 Deputy to the Givati Brigade Col. Ron Ashrov
10 Commander of the Israel Paratroopers' Brigade in Gaza Col. Hertzi Halevy
11 Commander of 401st Armored Corps Brigade convoy Col. Yigal Slovik
12 Commander of the 101st Battalion in the Paratrooper Brigade Lt. Col. Avi Blot
13 Lt. Col. Yoav Mordechai, who served as a commander of the Golani infantry brigade's 13th Battalion in Gaza
14 Givati squad commander Col. Tomer Tsiter
15 Brigade commander in Battalion 51 Col. Avi Peled

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=87207&sectionid=351020101

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
FBI acknowledges evidence for CONTROLLED DEMOLITION by Architect, Richard Gage as:  "backed by thorough research and analysis."  
See what Gage calls "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" in:  9/11: BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH: http://gators911truth.org/PDF/FBI-CD-FF.pdf
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

Mossad Link Found to One of Key 9-11 Hijackers

Israeli Secret Service Mossad Link Found to One of Key 9-11 Hijackers - A NEW ISRAELI CONNECTION

Written by www.daily.pk

Sunday, 01 March 2009 00:49

A NEW ISRAELI CONNECTION to the tragic events of Sept. 11, 2001 has recently been unveiled. Buried in a New York Times story on Feb. 19 was the eye-opening revelation that a Lebanese Muslim Arab who has been taken into custody by the Lebanon—which has accused him of being a spy for some 25 years for Israeli intelligence —just happens to be a cousin of one of the Muslims alleged to have been one of the 9-11 hijackers. Although Ali al-Jarrah was—publicly—an outspoken proponent of the Palestinian cause, it now turns out that he was actually working as a paid asset of the Mossad for more than two decades, betraying his own nation and conducting spying operations against Palestinian groups and the pro-Palestinian party Hezbollah. The New York Times, reporting on the al-Jarrah affair, revealed this: "It is not the family's first brush with notoriety. One of Mr. Jarrah's cousins, Ziad al-Jarrah, was among the 19 hijackers who carried out the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001." The Times added that the men were 20 years apart in age and "do not appear to have known each other well." The gratuitous Times suggestion that the two cousins "do not appear to have known each other well" is intriguing, inasmuch as it is an admission that they did, in fact, know one another. And that could be very telling, for there are those who are now suggesting that the older cousin may indeed have recruited his younger cousin as an asset for Israeli intelligence. The circumspect stance taken by the Times is no surprise, considering the fact that the Times is quite aware of the fact that there have been many sources—including American Free Press—which have alleged that the 9-11 conspiracy was infiltrated, if not controlled outright, by Israeli intelligence from the beginning. If the younger al-Jarrah was indeed an Israeli asset inside the 9-11 conspiracy, this would not be the first time that a Muslim Arab was involved, acting as a Mossad agent, in an attack on the World Trade Center. As far back as August 3, 1993, investigative reporter Robert I. Friedman revealed in New York's Village Voice that Ahmad Ajaj, a 27-year-old West Bank Palestinian held in federal custody for conspiracy in the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993, may have been a Mossad mole, according to Friedman's sources. Ajaj was arrested at Kennedy Airport on Sept. 1, 1992, after he arrived on a Pakistani International flight from Peshawar carrying a forged Swedish passport and bombmaking manuals. He was taken into custody, and subsequently pleaded guilty to entering the country illegally. Ajaj's traveling companion was Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, an Iraqi who law enforcement sources say was a "key player" in the first World Trade Center bombing. And it should be noted that it was Ajaj who was the source of the famed "al Qaeda terrorist manual" that was widely touted by the FBI in the wake of the second World Trade Center attack in 2001. In addition, Ajaj's colleague—Ramzi Yousef—is the nephew of Khalid Sheikh Mohamad, whom the U.S. government has said was the "mastermind" of the 9-11 attacks. In this regard, it is also important to point out that, for many years even prior to the first attack on the World Trade Center, there were many figures in Islamic circles who believed that Mohamad and Yousef were actually undercover assets for Israel. Although the FBI identified Ajaj as a senior intifada terrorist, with links to Hamas (the Palestinian Islamic fundamentalist organization), Kol Ha'ir, a respected Hebrewlanguage weekly published in Jerusalem, said Ajaj was never involved in intifada activities or with Hamas or even the Palestine Liberation Organization. Instead, according to Kol Ha'ir, Ajaj was actually a petty crook arrested in 1988 for counterfeiting U.S. dollars out of a base in East Jerusalem. Ajaj was convicted of the counterfeiting charges and then sentenced to two-anda- half years in prison. According to Friedman, writing in The Village Voice: "It was during his prison stay that Mossad, Israel's CIA, apparently recruited him, say Israeli intelligence sources. By the time he was released after having served just one year, he had seemingly undergone a radical transformation." Friedman reported that Ajaj had suddenly become a devout Muslim and an outspoken hard-line nationalist. Then, Ajaj was arrested for smuggling weapons into the West Bank, supposedly for Fatah al-Islam, a faction of the PLO. But Friedman says this was actually a sham. Friedman's sources in Israeli intelligence say that the arrest and Ajaj's subsequent deportation were "staged by Mossad to establish his credentials as an intifada activist. Mossad allegedly 'tasked' Ajaj to infiltrate radical Palestinian groups operating outside Israel and to report back to Tel Aviv. Israeli intelligence sources say that it is not unusual for Mossad to recruit from the ranks of common criminals." After Ajaj's "deportation" from Israel, he showed up in Pakistan, where he turned up in the company of the anti-Soviet mujahideen rebels in Afghanistan. (Incidentally, Andrew Allen, a wealthy San Francisco character who likes to take on assignments for the CIA to prevent boredom, admitted under oath "running" supplies into Afghanistan. He was also instrumental in destroying Librty Lobby and its newspaper, The Spotlight.) This could indicate that Ajaj was working for the Mossad, for—according to Covert Action Information Bulletin (September 1987)—the funding and supply lines for the mujahideen were not only the "the second largest covert operation" in the CIA's history, but they were also, according to former Mossad operative Victor Ostrovsky (writing in The Other Side of Deception), under the direct supervision of the Mossad. Ostrovsky wrote: It was a complex pipeline, since a large portion of the mujahideen's weapons were American-made and were supplied to the Muslim Brotherhood directly from Israel, using as carriers the Bedouin nomads who roamed the demilitarized zones in the Sinai. After Ajaj's ventures with the mujahideen, he popped up in New York and purported to befriend members of a small so-called "radical" clique surrounding the blind Sheikh Abdel-Rahman, who was accused of being the mastermind of the World Trade Center bombing. On Feb. 26, 1993, the actual day of the World Trade Center bombing, Ajaj was "safe" in federal prison serving a six-month sentence for entering the country on a forged passport. Later, he was indicted for conspiracy in the WTC bombing. According to Robert Friedman, "If Ajaj was recruited by Mossad, it is not known whether he continued to work for the Israeli spy agency after he was deported. One possibility, of course, is that upon leaving Israel and meeting radical Muslims close to the blind Egyptian sheikh, his loyalties shifted." However, Friedman also reported another frightening possibility: "Another scenario is that he had advance knowledge of the World Trade Center bombing, which he shared with Mossad, and that Mossad, for whatever reason, kept the secret to itself. If true, U.S. intelligence sources speculate that Mossad might have decided to keep the information closely guarded so as not to compromise its undercover agen

 

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
FBI acknowledges evidence for CONTROLLED DEMOLITION by Architect, Richard Gage as:  "backed by thorough research and analysis."  
See what Gage calls "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" in:  9/11: BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH: http://gators911truth.org/PDF/FBI-CD-FF.pdf
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

BBC Censors Bhutto's Bin Laden Murder Claim

VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnychOXj9Tg

On 2nd November 2007 the late Benazir Bhutto gave an interview to David Frost on his show Frost all over the World in which she claims that Omar Sheikh murdered Osama Bin Laden. The show originally aired on Al Jazeera. However when the BBC got hold of it they sleekly edited out this claim. See the unedited clip below. Following complaints - by amongst others the guy who posted the video below - the edited segment was finally restored on the BBC version of the interview (just a few days ago, I think). See the edit below, it begins at around 2:20.

BBC Several questions. Firstly, and most obviously, why did the BBC edit the interview? Clearly we don't know. But it's suspiscious. If they knew the story to be false then they should have aired it and written a piece declaring it as such. The BBC is, after all, a news organisation. They're meant to employ journalists to tell us what's going on in the world. But instead of this they edit Bhutto's allegation as if it did not exist.

STOP PRESS! The BBC have explained why they edited the interview. I did a search on the BBC website for 'Bhutto Bin Laden murder'. Whilst there's no story in relation to Bhutto's allegation, there is an editorial about it. Following accusations of censorship Steve Herrmann, editor of the BBC news website, defends the editing of the interview by saying that the item producer was under "time pressure" to get the interview out. He says that Bhutto's allegation "appeared so unexpected that it seemed she had simply mis-spoken." Thus the allegation was edited to "avoid confusion."

Fucking bullshit. If the producer of the interview was truly under "time" pressure to get the interview out then surely it would have been quicker to not edit it. Editing something obviously takes more time than not editing it. And it "appeared" unexpected? It "seemed" that she had mis-spoken? You have to be kidding me. Is Bhutto's allegation true or isn't it? That's the only relevant question here. The BBC doesn't receive over £3billion a year in licence fees to base its version of 'truth' on how an allegation appeared or seemed. I almost can't believe I'm coming out with this phrase, but 'it's a disgrace'. Even the admission that the interview was edited to "avoid confusion." It doesn't matter whether it's confusing or not. What matters is whether or not it's true. Yet even in Harrmann's editorial, the importance of this question completely passes him by. He doesn't even acknowledge that whether or not Bin Laden was or was not murdered by Omar Sheikh is something that requires an answer.

Omar Sheikh You will probably recall this name. British born Sheikh was arrested by Pakistani police in February 2002 for the murder of the Wall Street journalist Daniel Pearl. He was charged and sentenced to death in Pakistan in July 2002. The sentence has yet to be carried out.

There's also reason to believe that Omar Sheikh was a British agent working for MI6. Michael Meacher, Oldham MP and former cabinet minister under Blair, claims that Sheikh was recruited by MI6 along with anything up to 200 other British muslims. Sheikh and the others were sent to overseas terrorist training camps under the protection of the Pakistani secret service, the ISI, to act on behalf of UK and US interests in - amongst other things - an effort to overthrow the Afghan communist regime and its Soviet backers. Futhermore Pakistan President General Musharraf also claimed that Sheikh was a British agent in his book Line of Fire.

It will come as no surprise to find that the BBC in their profile of Sheikh completely fail to mention this. Something else the BBC fails to mention:

Omar Sheikh was responsible for transfering $100,000 to Mohammed Atta, the leading 9/11 hijacker, just days before the attacks. This transfer was made at the behest of General Mahmood Ahmed, head of Pakistan's ISI. This transfer was confirmed by Dennis Lomel, director of the FBI's financial crimes unit.

Was Omar Sheikh still a British agent when he made the wire transfer to Atta? Did MI6 know about the transfer? Were they in any way complicit?

Bin Laden Murdered Claims Bhutto This would hardly be a pithy little tit-bit story, would it? Yet there's no such story on the BBC website. And they made every attempt to withhold it from us. Herrmann's defense of the charge of censorship does nothing but confirm it. The BBC did censor it. And you have to ask yourself why.

But is Bhutto's allegation true? Did Sheikh murder Bin Laden? I have no idea. But it's an important question. If he did then Sheikh would have to have killed Bin Laden prior to his arrest in February 2002. And if he did, then every video and audio message by Bin Laden since at least this time can be known to be a fabrication. This further means that every news agency which carried the messages were knowingly or unknowingly complicit in an effort to convince us of a threat which did not exist. And who produced the fake audio and video messages if Bin Laden was dead?

If Sheikh didn't kill Bin Laden then we should at least know. This question deserves an answer. Even a flat out rebuttal would suffice. Yet the BBC says Nothing. At least nothing other than the allegation "appeared so unexpected that it seemed she had simply mis-spoken." Which manages neither to affirm or deny the claim.

Remember that Britain invaded Afghanistan on the grounds that Bin Laden was behind the 9/11 attacks. At least that was the cover story for the invasion. If Bin Laden was murdered or killed in late 2001 (and there's good reason to think he was: even the BBC admit that no one has seen him since that time) then could Britain's continued presence in Afghanistan be publicly justified?

Initiating A 9/11 Criminal Investigation in the USA

Initiating A 9/11 Criminal Investigation in the United States

 

The American People Deserve accountablility for the massive National Security failures of 9/11/2001

FACT: The 9/11 Commission found that numerous government officials failed in their respective duties to protect the American people from terrorist attack on 9/11/2001.

 

FACT: The 9/11 Commission admitted there were MASSIVE government failures on 9/11. To-date, not one person has been held accountable for the massive security failures on 9/11. 

 

FACT: There has never been a criminal investigation into "9/11" the very worst government security failure in U.S. history. 

 

FACT:  the N.Y.F.D. has forbid N.Y. firefighters from publicly discussing what they saw on 9/11.

 

FACT: Cheney and Bush publicly threatened members of Congress to cut programs, etc. if Congress held any 9/11 investigation.

 

FACT: Cheney had NO authority to issue orders to the military, and the evidence indicates Cheney clearly broke the law on the morning of 9/11.

 

America's need for accountability on the security failures of 9/11 is a undisputed basis for a federal criminal investigation.

 

We, The People seek to hold accountable every government official who failed their duty to protect America.

Accountability for our government's failure to protect thousands of Americans inside the United States of America on September 11th, 2001.

Why Americans seek ACCOUNTABILITY and JUSTICE:

Accountability for "future deterrence of institutional negligence" is the seminal reasons for a true, ongoing, in-depth, full criminal investigation of the persons and events of 9/11.

Justice for the murder of thousands of Americans on 9/11.

Marshall support from the legal community, law enforcement and the NYC Fire Dept. in seeking a criminal investigation into these matters by letting them know we support them and the real need for accountability. These witnesses need federal whistleblower protection, since the N.Y.F.D. has forbid N.Y. firefighters, etc. from publicly discussing what they saw on 9/11.

Enlist public support by asking them to call their representatives and "insist" that the U.S. Attorney's Office get busy with a criminal investigation of all the currently known parties.

ron@investigate911.com
 
http://www.investigate911.com

http://www.projectfilibuster.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmGeUlCMYp8

http://www.youtube.com/kucinich1

http://www.corvuswire.com

http://www.youtube.com/americafirstcrowd

Indictments:

Before the target of an investigation is arrested, prosecutors generally will take the evidence they have gathered to a grand jury. Grand juries are composed of 16 to 23 citizens. Agreement by a bare majority is required to find probable cause exists that a crime was committed.

Grand juries are formally supervised by a district judge, often the chief judge, but for all practical purposes they function day-to-day under the auspices of the U.S. Attorney's Office. Only prosecutors present evidence before a grand jury, and a finding of probable cause – necessary to issue an indictment – is a relatively low standard of proof.

The indictment lists the crimes the defendant allegedly committed and describes the facts the government believes support those allegations. It is a roadmap to what the prosecution intends to prove at trial. Grand jury indictments are returned to the district court – usually to a magistrate judge – in a sealed court hearing. Indictments generally are unsealed after a defendant is arrested.

A criminal case also can begin without an indictment. In these cases, the lead investigator swears out a criminal complaint, called an "information," setting forth the same kinds of allegations and facts that would be contained in an indictment. Absent an indictment, the prosecution must convince a judge that there is probable cause to proceed with the case. These hearings are held in open court after the defendant has been arrested in a felony case.

 

A defendant can agree to waive indictment and proceed with the case based on the criminal complaint, or can demand that the prosecutor seek an indictment.

 

Source: http://www.investigate911.com/investigate911.htm

 

 

 

 

EPA Response to Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001

Response to Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001

http://www.epa.gov/oecaerth/criminal/homelandsecurity/911.html

Homeland Security

Immediately after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the Criminal Enforcement Program was mobilized to assist with emergency response activities, evidence recovery and body recovery duties.

World Trade Center:
Within minutes of the first attack in New York on September 11, the EPAs Criminal Investigation Division's Special Agent-in-Charge began to coordinate, as the law enforcement liaison, with the FBI and the New York City Police Department, through the Joint Terrorism Task Force, to provide crisis management support to the FBI. Over the next five days, EPA Criminal Enforcement personnel were on site at the World Trade Center, assisting in decontamination, helping to gather crime scene evidence (photography, videotaping, evidence gathering, etc.) and supplying other investigative and technical support to the FBI, NYPD, U.S. Attorney's Office and the U.S. Secret Service. EPA Special Agents have assisted at the Fresh Kills Landfill to process debris from the WTC for personal remains and effects, as well as obtaining evidence of the crime.

The Pentagon:
By noon on September 11, an EPA Criminal Investigation Division Special Agent was on the scene at the Pentagon, providing emergency response investigative support and facilitating site safety for EPA Region 3 Emergency Response personnel and the FBI. On September 12, the FBI declared the Pentagon a crime scene, and EPA Special Agents were on the scene assisting in decontamination, gathering crime scene evidence (photography, videotaping, evidence gathering, etc.) and supplying other investigative and technical support to the FBI. In addition, EPA Special Agents assisted with body recovery and site safety until September 27, when the agents departed after the FBI returned the site to the control of the Department of Defense and FEMA.

Shanksville, Pennsylvania Crash Site:
From September 12 through the 14th, the EPA's Special Agents were on the Somerset County, Pennsylvania airplane crash site assisting the FBI's Pittsburgh Field Office. The agents facilitated the law enforcement liaison to establish EPA Region 2 for air monitoring for the safety of persons at the crash scene, as well as assisting in the investigation of the crash itsel